Social Media and the Hatch Act: How To Make Sure your Tweets Don’t Cost You Your Job

Social Media and the Hatch Act: How To Make Sure your Tweets Don’t Cost You Your Job

As we approach the presidential election in November, it is important for all federal employees to review the guidelines governing their expression of political support. The governing law, as all federal employees should know, is the Hatch Act. First passed in 1939, the Hatch Act regulates what federal employees can share or promote regarding political campaigns. The act is frequently updated, and the latest revisions in 2014 outlined how federal employees can display their political preferences on social media. While most federal employees are familiar with Hatch Act provisions in their everyday interactions, the explosion in social media over the last decade and its removed quality leads some employees to forget that the Hatch Act applies on social media as well.

Read More
Congressional Offices: Understaffed, Underfunded, Underperforming
From the Hill FEDmanager From the Hill FEDmanager

Congressional Offices: Understaffed, Underfunded, Underperforming

In an effort to decrease the intense staff turnover and declining policy expertise on the Hill, five long-time Congressional observers sent a letter to House and Senate Republican and Democratic leaders, urging them to create a Joint Committee on the Capacity of Congress “to examine and improve congressional operation, which is suffering from understaffing and underfunding.”

Read More
Veterans Benefits Administration Fails to Rebut Whistleblower Reprisal Claim Despite Lack of Evidence of Motive to Retaliate
Case Law Update Conor D. Dirks Case Law Update Conor D. Dirks

Veterans Benefits Administration Fails to Rebut Whistleblower Reprisal Claim Despite Lack of Evidence of Motive to Retaliate

Although the Merit Systems Protection Board found little evidence of retaliatory motive on the part of the Agency, the Veterans Benefits Administration presented insufficient evidence to show that it would have canceled an employee’s duties as Program Manager regardless of her disclosure that she believed Federal Acquisition Regulations had been violated.

Read More
MSPB Reverses Suspension of Employee Charged with Creating Appearance of Conflict of Interest
Case Law Update Conor D. Dirks Case Law Update Conor D. Dirks

MSPB Reverses Suspension of Employee Charged with Creating Appearance of Conflict of Interest

The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) suspended a Contracting Officer Representative for 30 days after alleging that the employee created the appearance of a conflict of interest and failed to disclose an outside business venture, but the Merit Systems Protection Board reversed an administrative judge’s initial decision upholding the penalty, finding that no appearance of a conflict of interest had been created and that the employee had no prior duty to disclose the outside activity at issue.

Read More