Senate Dispute Over $1.8B DOJ Fund Stalls Massive Immigration Enforcement Bill
The future of the $70 billion reconciliation bill funding immigration enforcement efforts is in doubt, as Senate Republicans clash with President Trump over the creation of a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund at the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Senate Republicans had planned to move the immigration legislation before leaving for Memorial Day, but that plan was derailed after news of the fund came to light– effectively dooming the chances of passing the legislation by President Trump’s self-imposed June 1 deadline.
The controversy stems from a DOJ settlement tied to President Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns. The agreement establishes a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund intended to indemnify individuals who claim they were targeted by politically motivated investigations.
Some Republican Senators fear the money might benefit the January 6 rioters who had attacked law enforcement. Others spoke out after a tense lunch meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
“So the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops?” said Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the former GOP leader. “Utterly stupid, morally wrong — take your pick.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) says the administration needs to provide an explanation.
“Not a big fan, and I’m not sure exactly how they intend to use it,” Senator Thune told Punchbowl News. “I don’t see a purpose for that.”
Meanwhile, Senate Democrats indicated they will offer amendments to restrict the fund while mounting broader legislative challenges to the immigration enforcement package.
“In the coming debate, the contrast between Democrats and Republicans will be on full display,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
House Breaks with Senate on Fund
In contrast, House Republicans largely support the compensation mechanism and criticized Senate counterparts for delaying the broader reconciliation package.
Proponents within the chamber view the fund as a necessary measure to compensate victims of politically motivated litigation, or “lawfare.”
“We’ve wasted a whole daggum week, and I think it’s kind of pathetic,” said Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN).
