Social Feeds

Be sure to Like and Follow FEDmanager on Facebook and on Twitter for exclusive content and news stories affecting the federal community and tips on maximizing your federal career and advancing in the federal workforce.


Subscribe to our newsletter. It's FREE. Read our privacy policy

Integrating the Competencies into Your “Results Driven” ECQ Narrative

Written by Barbara Adams on . Posted in Career Tip of the Week

Most Senior Executive Service (SES) positions will require you to submit Executive Core Qualification (ECQ) narratives. When you’re developing your narratives, it is important to ensure the examples you provide match the ECQ titles of Leading Change, Leading People, Results Driven, Business Acumen, and Building Coalitions. But is that enough?  

Let’s use Results Driven as an example. As a leader, aren’t you always creating results? Don’t so many things you do fall under multiple ECQ categories? How do you ensure that your Results Driven ECQ is presented in the way that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) expects?

Well, you obviously need to follow all of OPM’s guidance. Among other things, you must present your examples in the Challenge-Context-Action-Result (CCAR) format, follow any length requirements (usually 2 pages, or 8,000 characters per ECQ), and use examples that focus on your executive leadership or potential. 

But here is possibly the most important word to keep in mind when doing all of these things: the competencies. 

OPM has assigned specific competencies to each ECQ, and you can think of those competencies as the “lens” or perspective through which OPM wants to see your stories. If you don’t weave most or all of them into the narrative, you are at serious risk of being rejected by the Qualifications Review Board (QRB). Let’s go back to our Results Driven example. 

The Results Driven ECQ involves the ability to meet organizational goals and customer expectations, and the competencies are: Accountability, Customer Service, Problem Solving, Decisiveness, Technical Credibility, and Entrepreneurship. Inherent to this ECQ is the ability to own and manage responsibilities and make decisions that produce high-quality results by applying technical knowledge, analyzing problems, and calculating/mitigating risks. This includes the ability to make timely, effective decisions and to produce lasting results through the assessment and evaluation of programs and policies, as well as to hold yourself and others accountable. 

Regardless of how great you are at creating results, and how strongly you think your example meets the title of Results Driven, you must look at the specific competencies and ask yourself whether you can address most or all of them effectively. One of the best ways to do this is to turn those competencies into questions, and then answer those questions in the “action” section of your narrative. 

Here are some of the questions you might ask when writing up your Results Driven ECQ narrative:

  • What is the topic of the example? Was this an opportunity to improve the organization’s production, products, or customer service? (problem solving) 
  • What was the pressure to complete this project? Was it customer-driven? (customer service)
  • Who were you accountable to during this initiative, and how did you ensure accountability at all levels? (accountability)
  • Describe exactly what you did (your actions, decisions, communications, etc.) that moved the project, task, or problem to resolution or outcome. (problem solving)
  • Were you ever responsible for any make-or-break decision that could have affected the project? (decisiveness) 
  • What actions did you take that demonstrate your mastery or specialized knowledge in your specific field? (technical credibility)  
  • In your results, can you describe how your actions and efforts positioned the organization for future success and growth? (entrepreneurship)

You can find job-winning, OPM-approved samples of SES application packages and a complete set of ECQ builders in CareerPro Global’s book, Roadmap to the Senior Executive Service. Get your copy today by searching on Amazon.

Barbara Adams is the President and CEO of CareerPro Global, Inc. (CPG). She has been on the leading edge of SES application development for decades. Committed to providing world-class service, she has also built an SES writing team that has assisted more than 2,500 clients develop their application materials. Ms. Adams has been featured on TV and radio and as a presenter at numerous career conferences. She is the co-author of several books and CPG’s new online Master Federal Career Coach (MFCC) certification program. Follow this link for some free training and to learn more.

YGL Profiles

An Interview with Melanie Keller, Assoc. Director for Management, Center for Drug Evaluation & Research (CDER)

Melanie Keller is the Associate Director for Management at the Center for Drug Evaluation & Research (CDER), the largest Center at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). She serves as the Center’s Executive Officer and oversees all administrative operations. Ms. Keller is responsible for budget formulation, user fee collection, and execution of a $1 billion annual budget. She also leads and directs the Center’s human capital management of more than 4,500 employees, and is currently leading recruitment strategies for 795 vacancies within the Center. 


From the Hill

Senators Explore Oversight of Small Agencies, Drafting New IG Bill

Senators last week discussed oversight of small agencies, commissions, and boards with a hearing before the Senate’s Financial and Contracting Oversight subcommittee.

Challenges of small agency oversight was discussed at the hearing, as were potential legislative actions to improve the oversight of such organizations.  

Chairwoman of the subcommittee, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) said at the hearing that there are at least 40 small agencies with over $1 billion in budgetary authority with “virtually no oversight.”


Case Law Update

MSPB Grants Veteran’s Request for Corrective Action after DoD Rejected Job Application

A GS-12 Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) employee applied for a GS-13 position. The vacancy announcement, issued by DCMA, listed the DCMA and Department of Defense (“DoD”) employees that could apply for the position, and specified that applicants “MUST submit documents verifying your eligibility with your application package. These documents may include, but are not limited to: for current employment verification, a non-award [Standard Form (SF)]-50 or DD3434…” The DCMA employee’s application contained a resume, an SF-52, education transcripts, and a Form DD 214, but was rejected due to the employee’s failure to include an SF-50. An MSPB administrative judge found that the agency improperly rejected the employee’s application, because the SF-52 he included contained the same employment verification documentation. However, the administrative judge ultimately denied the employee’s request for corrective action because of a finding that the agency did not accept applications from individuals outside its own workforce under merit promotion procedures, and therefore had not violated statute by denying the employee, who was a veteran under 5 U.S.C. § 3304(f)(1), the opportunity to compete. On April 1, 2014, the MSPB reversed the initial decision in part, and granted the employee’s request for corrective action.


GEICO's Good Stuff

Tell Us: Why Do You Heart Public Service

GEICO’s Good Stuff is a column series highlighting great stuff happening in the federal community.

The Public Employees Roundtable (PER) is collecting testimonials from government employees and members of the public in support of an I “Heart” Public Service whiteboard photo campaign. Images will be posted on the PER on Facebook and Instagram pages.

The group behind Public Service Recognition Week (PSRW), which takes place this year from May 4-10, launched the whiteboard campaign in support of this year’s theme: Proud to Serve.

Government employees and members of the public are invited to fill out their own whiteboard and share why they love public service and tag their photos with #PSRW and #Proud2ServeUSA.